Tesla loses bid to overturn $243M Autopilot verdict

Tesla has lost its attempt to overturn a $243 million verdict tied to its Autopilot system, keeping a major legal ruling against the company in place.

Feb 21, 2026 - 18:42
 21
Tesla loses bid to overturn $243M Autopilot verdict

A judge has rejected Tesla’s request to overturn a $243 million jury verdict that found the automaker partially responsible for a deadly crash involving its Autopilot driver assistance system.

“The grounds for relief that Tesla relies upon are virtually the same as those Tesla put forth previously during the course of trial and in their briefings on summary judgment — arguments that were already considered and rejected,” the decision from Hon. Judge Beth Bloom states. “Furthermore, Tesla does not present additional arguments or controlling law that persuades this Court to alter its earlier decisions or the jury verdict.”

In August, a jury issued a $243 million verdict against Tesla tied to a 2019 fatal crash in Florida that killed Naibel Benavides and critically injured Dillon Angulo. The jury determined the driver was responsible for two-thirds of the fault and assigned one-third to Tesla. The jury also assessed punitive damages only against Tesla.

In its attempt to reverse the ruling, Tesla’s attorneys argued that responsibility for the crash lay with the driver, who contributed to causing the collision.

What's Your Reaction?

Like Like 0
Dislike Dislike 0
Love Love 0
Funny Funny 0
Angry Angry 0
Sad Sad 0
Wow Wow 0
Shivangi Yadav Shivangi Yadav is a technology writer at TechAmerica.ai, covering artificial intelligence, startups, digital platforms, consumer technology, mobility, and emerging technologies. Her reporting follows major developments across the global technology industry, from AI companies and startup funding to product launches, regulatory investigations, software platforms, and changes affecting large technology markets. At TechAmerica.ai, Shivangi looks beyond the initial announcement to understand what a development means in practice. Her coverage often examines how new technologies, regulatory decisions, and business moves could affect companies, consumers, and the wider industry. She writes for an international audience, focusing on clear, well-researched reporting that gives readers useful context on fast-moving technology stories.